↓ Skip to main content

ASBMB

Benefits of Collisional Cross Section Assisted Precursor Selection (caps-PASEF) for Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 3,243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
twitter
40 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits of Collisional Cross Section Assisted Precursor Selection (caps-PASEF) for Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, July 2020
DOI 10.1074/mcp.ra120.002094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Steigenberger, Henk W.P. van den Toorn, Emiel Bijl, Jean-François Greisch, Oliver Räther, Markus Lubeck, Roland J. Pieters, Albert J.R. Heck, Richard A. Scheltema

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Chemistry 10 12%
Unspecified 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#231,812
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#5
of 3,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,389
of 430,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.